The last two episodes of Energy Thinks have got me asking this question: As you execute your vision for the energy future, which essential steps are you most likely to overlook? Or avoid! Because work as challenging as leading into the future requires acknowledging all your blind spots.
With increased ESG and anti-ESG proposals but unenthusiastic support for either, company executives may feel locked in a cultural tug of war. Instead of betting on one side, let’s focus on how oil and gas leaders are taking the lessons from proxy season to invest in an enduring sustainability strategy.
This proxy season, submissions are on track to tie or eclipse last year’s record-breaking tally of 627 ESG-related proposals.
It may feel as if anti-ESG pressure is growing and will fundamentally reshape expectations of your company. Yet the directional drivers that having an ESG strategy answers haven’t gone anywhere.
Enter an unexpected antagonist (or is it protagonist?): EPA’s draft methane rule. How your company should respond depends on how the states you operate in decide to act.
In this Both True, learn how new federal funding is increasing expectations for climate action from your company. With these growing expectations come new opportunities for you — and new risks.
In the 2022 proxy season, banks and insurance companies were put in the hot seat for their continued funding of fossil fuels.
In this two-part series, we’ll give insight into what this proxy season means for oil and gas companies.
In this Both True, I cover the tempting pitfalls of reactive political engagement and urge you to chart a steady, resilient course free of sharks.
At Adamantine, we’re advising game-changing leaders to adopt cautious optimism, avoid the moody pendulum of political commentary, and stay the leadership course.
Newsletter
By Tisha Schuller