There is absolutely a path to community partnership in decarbonization projects in red states. Yet every successful engagement must consider the unique background and needs of these communities.
It is not a given that any company will be around in 10 years. That’s why I’ve written my forthcoming book, Real Decarbonization: How Oil and Gas Companies Are Seizing the Low-Carbon Future.
Just when leaders have started implementation of their ESG plans, the anti-ESG movement is getting some traction. What should you do when you get contradictory ESG messages from important corners?
In the 2022 proxy season, banks and insurance companies were put in the hot seat for their continued funding of fossil fuels.
In this two-part series, we’ll give insight into what this proxy season means for oil and gas companies.
Even before the Russian invasion of Ukraine and resulting tectonic shifts around energy politics, there were signs that the “divest from oil and gas” movement might be losing steam. Investors under increasing pressure to address climate change were starting to fall into two camps: (a) those who would divest and (b) those who would engage with companies to create change.
While BlackRock’s stance on sustainability keeps revealing nuance, it’s wishful thinking to assume that nuance means anything less than BlackRock’s continuing strong commitment to strategy, reporting, and disclosure requirements in response to climate change. Game-changing leaders recognize this continues to influence investor expectations of their companies.
BlackRock developments matter because they demonstrate how ESG pressures are translating into investor expectations. But with so much happening in the news, how does the CEO letter translate into actions you need to take in 2022?
Blackrock’s new Expectations lays out the five key expectations that translate to five changes you need to incorporate into your 2021 ESG strategy. The good news: We have been talking about all this for some time.
Newsletter
By Tisha Schuller