In this Both True, learn how new federal funding is increasing expectations for climate action from your company. With these growing expectations come new opportunities for you — and new risks.
Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is recognized as an important decarbonization tool, yet opposition is mounting. Companies must build support for this resource as the energy transition unfolds.
One company’s Scope 3 emissions are another’s Scope 1. It’s tempting to throw up your hands and declare accounting for your company’s Scope 3 emissions an unreasonable, even impossible task. But who is required to account for this Scope 3?
In the 2022 proxy season, banks and insurance companies were put in the hot seat for their continued funding of fossil fuels.
In this two-part series, we’ll give insight into what this proxy season means for oil and gas companies.
Environmental justice (EJ) should be on the mind of game-changing oil and gas leaders. That’s why my colleague Anne Carto is guest-authoring today’s primer. If you thought EJ was someone else’s responsibility, read on to understand why you — like every other oil and gas leader — need to get familiar with the expectations and social risks around your company’s EJ strategy.
Ever since Russia invaded Ukraine, many energy observers have predicted that the renewed global focus on energy security means the global focus on climate change is over. My view is very different: I look at this moment as an opportunity for oil and gas leadership to respond to a range of social and financial pressures for cleaner energy — pressures that will only intensify.
I repeatedly find myself in conversations where I start somewhere “in the middle” on what oil and gas companies need to do to thrive in a time of continuous disruption: engage millennials, share aspirations, take the leadership mantle. And company leaders want to do with me what they are doing with the skeptical public: explain the need for energy and why the world needs them.
Newsletter
By Tisha Schuller