What To Watch: Issue #5

Read the first four installments of the “What to Watch” series here.

It’s easy to roll our eyes when prominent public figures, from actors to U.S. presidential candidates, make nonsensical statements about the future of energy.

The problem is, not everyone knows it’s nonsensical.

Oppositional public figures are smoke signals for the kinds of interrogations you will face. Let’s put that new knowledge to work.

Both of these things are true:

  1. Few public figures and politicians have pragmatic experience on energy and climate issues in general, and solutions in particular. But they can make sweeping oppositional statements against oil and gas companies and projects because those statements have little downside for them.
  2. Such statements are both reflective of and influential to public opinion.

The problem

Fossil fuel opposition in many forms is becoming increasingly popular, leading actors to oppose fracking or presidential candidates to declare energy and climate “a national emergency.” These statements once produced only shrugs in those charged with actually providing energy to the public. Now, they’re making energy production and delivery more difficult. 

In 2013, Yoko Ono released “Don’t Frack My Mother” to pressure Governor Cuomo to ban hydraulic fracturing in New York. Around that same time, Matt Damon starred in Promised Land, a movie vilifying oil and gas exploration and production. In September 2018, 200 actors joined scientists in an open letter calling for urgent action on climate change.

And I bet you didn’t know that “polar fracking” could create an earthly apocalypse inclusive of zombies? (Hat tip to Tim Olson who sent me Daniel Raimi’s tweet.) Et tu, Bill Murray? And that’s the secondfrack-generated zombie movie this year.

On March 15, 2019, students around the globe held a strike from school for climate action – one of their demands is that 2020 candidates support a green new deal. Inherent to all these climate-focused actions is an expectation that energy moves beyond fossil fuels.

It matters because

The more public perception sways toward highly simplified opposition to oil and gas, the more regulators, policy makers, investors, and community stakeholders feel empowered (and pressured) to make project development and operation more difficult.

The critical mistake companies are making

Dismissing this wave of opposition as irrelevant and unhinged. Which it is in many cases — but that’s beside the point.

Seize the daySuccessful companies will:

  • Find the Good Vibrations. Take the time to understand the good intentions behind these actions and the proponents’ desire to drive positive change. Each person wakes up in the morning certain that they are on the side of righteousness. By empathizing with the mindset of those in the opposition, we are in a better position to respond constructively when our stakeholders reflect a similar point of view. The response is then articulate and sensitive:  “I believe I understand why you have that concern. Can I offer another perspective?”
  • Aspire. Companies must be able to articulate their company’s role in creating an energy future that embraces the aspirations of stakeholders who expect a different energy future. Rather than fighting against the “visionary” nature of these perspectives, we must articulate a vision of a shared, ambitious energy future.

For practical thoughts on assessing and mitigating risk, check out What to Watch Issues #1 and #2.

If you’re taking the advice I offered in the opening installment of Both of These Things Are True, you are spending some time each day reading, listening to, and watching mainstream media offerings where climate dominates the energy conversation. It can be discouraging. Allow yourself a big sigh – and then seek to understand a new perspective. It makes the effort more of an adventure.

If this email was forwarded to you, you can subscribe to Both of These Things Are True here.

More Articles

Good Conflict

In the oil and gas industry, we find ourselves describing public hostility to our work in black-and-white terms, such as “fight for our lives” and “energy wars.” These characterizations serve a purpose: They unite oil and gas workers, give us a sense of shared purpose, and mobilize us to serve as industry ambassadors to the world. But could this kind of black-and-white thinking — which seems to strengthen our collective identity — also lead us to our demise? Now that’s worthy of contemplation.

What to Watch for 2022: Federal Policy

2021 ended with a whimper for the budget reconciliation package that Democrats had hoped to finish before the holidays. In this edition of Both True, I give you what to watch for regarding federal policy in 2022 — a year that begins with Democrats hoping to resuscitate their climate agenda and the midterm election season moving into full swing.

newspaper headline about gas prices with a calculator

What to Watch for 2022: Energy Prices

The recent price volatility around oil and gas has spurred myriad interpretations — most of which are interesting for how they demonstrate our selective reasoning, usually defined by our politics. Further, the line of reasoning most industry executives are likely to pursue is in fact the one most likely to undermine their leadership position.